Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Yay, RAIN!

  • Aug. 19th, 2008 at 9:05 PM
baghead
Hooray, it's raining. I walked four miles today and discovered a Chinese restaurant with the unfortunate street address of 4444. D:

I didn't get nearly enough (any) writing done today. This is some combination of post-Clarion-ness and I-need-a-job-now-ness. However, my manager called to tell me that the official paperwork had been done. I might be able to go back in as soon as Thursday. Paycheck in September, wooooo.

This should fix one of my writing problems!

I've discovered through trial and error that I write less when I am unemployed than I do when I'm working a 30+ hour week with school* thrown in for the hell of it. I suspect that the reason for this is simple. When I have all day to do things in, well, I can just wait until later, right? However, I do actually have to get up at 6am if I'm scheduled in at 7am. That would be great, because right now I have a tendency to sleep in until 9, play Diablo and/or Final Fantasy 12 until 11 or noon, and, well, you get the whole sad picture.

I'm going to actually BEAT Diablo this time before I get permanently distracted! ARGH!

Financial security of some sort promotes creativity... who'd have guessed?

Another issue I've been having lately is that I have no idea what my writing process is anymore. It started to change while I was at Clarion, and really... hasn't settled at all. Then I wonder if I ever really had one. Right now my process seems to be "writes each story in a different way than the last." Way to keep things interesting, Kef.

Tomorrow there needs to be less fussing and more writing. I really need to finish editing one of my Clarion stories so that it can start the slushpile tango. I only have one story out right now because I was way too busy at Clarion to edit and submit. I have seven stories that I can probably sell if I edit and submit them. So, maybe I should go and do that.

I'm also going to the comics hell. I started reading Watchmen. I put it down after the fourth chapter and haven't picked it up again. I know I should, but I don't particularly want to. I like Dr. Manhattan, but... yeah. I think that Watchmen is technically amazing, but very slow and not really holding my interest at this point. I also still maintain that this is not Alan Moore's fault... I've just seen so much stuff using his themes that they don't interest me anymore. Yes, yes, vigilantes are bad. Okay, I get it.


First, sleep. Then... tomorrow. I mean, today. Yes.

*HA! BUT I AM DONE WITH SCHOOL. I AM FREE! FREE! FREE!!!

Tags:

Comments

[info]reicreature wrote:
Aug. 20th, 2008 10:47 am (UTC)
It took me six or seven tries before I finished Watchmen for similar reasons.
[info]everlostmage wrote:
Aug. 20th, 2008 11:41 am (UTC)
Re: Watchmen

It took me a bit to keep going at the start. But once I got halfway through, I couldn't put it down. It's really one of those hard to pick up, hard to put down once you're involved, books
[info]shweta_narayan wrote:
Aug. 20th, 2008 09:45 pm (UTC)
Ditto.
And ditto on it not being "vigilantes are bad".

I know I'm still missing a lot in Watchmen. Several things I did notice, like the fearful symmetry episode actually being, y'know, symmetrical that make it worth it anyway :)
[info]mcjulie wrote:
Aug. 20th, 2008 04:06 pm (UTC)
The fallow period
I was at a 25 years of Clarion West panel at WorldCon where the general consensus seemed to be that there was a fallow period of about six months after the workshop. Some people don't write at all during that period, other people write but nothing really takes off.

Not that I'm trying to jinx you or anything, but I figured if you knew it was normal, it would help.
[info]kehrli wrote:
Aug. 20th, 2008 05:11 pm (UTC)
Re: The fallow period
Oh, I know it's normal. Everybody talks about it. :)

I just refuse to accept 6 months! That's like a million years.

That being said, I do need to use some of my "I'm not writing" time on Moralicide, or I'm going to miss my Sept. 5 return date, and that bodes badly for.... everything.

If only I didn't need to rewrite the script before then. Aaaah. @__@

Edited at 2008-08-20 05:11 pm (UTC)
[info]shweta_narayan wrote:
Aug. 20th, 2008 09:46 pm (UTC)
Re: The fallow period
I didn't have the fallow period, Keffy. Or at least, I used it to edit a lot of stuffs.

Course, I didn't get much written at Clarion. *shrugs*
[info]pussinboots wrote:
Aug. 20th, 2008 05:19 pm (UTC)
"writes each story in a different way than the last."

I do that, and it actually works for me.
[info]kehrli wrote:
Aug. 20th, 2008 05:26 pm (UTC)
I don't think there's a problem with doing that, but it makes it harder to get into a routine.
[info]westrider wrote:
Aug. 20th, 2008 08:33 pm (UTC)
Seriously, make yourself finish Watchmen. Yes, there's a lot of background crap in there to wade through, and weird random stuff that doesn't seem to matter, but everything is in there for a reason, and it does all come together at the end.

And if you think all he's saying is "vigilantes are bad", you really don't get it yet. Heck, I've read the book something like 12 times, and I'm still not sure if I know what he's trying to say, because I keep noticing new stuff every time I read it that fundamentally changes the story.
[info]majortom_thecat wrote:
Aug. 21st, 2008 02:39 pm (UTC)
Hi, I've friended you. I found you through my friend fenmere. I also write stories, but none lately, so I'm here to witness and experience (vicariously of course) your writing process if you don't mind. My least favorite word in the English language is ensconced, what's yours? I hope it isn't vicariously.
[info]kehrli wrote:
Aug. 21st, 2008 04:48 pm (UTC)
No problem. And, I don't have a least favorite word. I like all words equally. They help me say things.
[info]syphos wrote:
Aug. 21st, 2008 05:51 pm (UTC)
Woah. Did you take down your post? I was merely being voicing a passing thought that I found to be amusing that maybe should have been muzzled. My initial reaction to the previews of the movie was the same as the one you posted today...
[info]syphos wrote:
Aug. 21st, 2008 05:55 pm (UTC)
Also, to shore up your initial impression, the male cows do not have udders as some sort of statement or pivotal concept. No, it comes down to "udders are funny": http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview/id/762425.html

[info]kehrli wrote:
Aug. 24th, 2008 06:05 am (UTC)
Yeah, I pulled it. I decided that maybe I was being hypocritical with the rant or something.

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Links

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow